�Ӱ�ֱ��

A conflict of interest is when your personal interests conflict with your duties as a �Ӱ�ֱ�� employee. The requires that you must report any actual, perceived or potential conflict of interest.

The key is appreciating a conflict exists, or may arise in the future, and managing it appropriately.

Failing to declare or properly manage a declared conflict of interest or conflict of duty is a breach of the Policy and could be a criminal offence. The following are examples of what a conflict of interest may look like.

• Allowing a personal relationship to improperly influence a decision
• Receiving a personal benefit by allowing family or friends to improperly access �Ӱ�ֱ�� services
• Without approval, undertaking external work or employment in conflict with an obligation to the �Ӱ�ֱ��
• Obtaining a service or benefit from a potential contractor that may influence your decision on a contract or tender application
• Accepting a gift from a student and as a result marking their assessment more favourably - if you are offered a gift by a student and feel that accepting that gift could affect your ability to assess the student's work objectively, you should not accept the gift. Please read more about .

For more information including how to declare a conflict of interest, please refer to the HR Handbook, the and the Conflict of Interest Procedure and Disclosure Form.

If you are the supervisor of someone who declares a conflict of interest involving a foreign national, please note and consider some additional reporting obligations you may both have under the Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme. Significant penalties can apply to those who fail to register a relevant relationship.

Undue influence is when someone, because of their status or position, seeks or is able to derive an outcome that is favourable to them by exerting pressure over you. That pressure is designed to get you to act in a way that is contrary to the �Ӱ�ֱ��'s best interests or your employment obligations, for example, to comply with �Ӱ�ֱ�� policies and procedures.

This is similar to a conflict of interest in that a relationship of confidence or trust exists between the two people, but is different in that the benefit is disproportionate.

The following are examples of undue influence:

• A well-known alumnus seeks to influence the naming of a building under terms that are inconsistent with �Ӱ�ֱ�� policy.
• An industry leader makes it clear to a researcher that funding will only continue if a research outcome is discovered that favours the industry leader's own business interests.
• A highly respected scholar you meet at an international conference offers to collaborate and then suggests you disregard international sanctions that strictly preclude such an arrangement.

Be alert to indicators of possible undue pressure, such as:

• Being asked to meet and discuss business at an unusual or inappropriate time or place
• Being asked to discuss business in secrecy
• Insistent demands that an arrangement be finalised immediately
• Over-stating (catastrophising) the consequences of delay
• Agitation or encouragement to disregard due process
• Resistance to obtaining approvals or seeking advice.

The consequence of undue influence can be damaging to you personally and to the �Ӱ�ֱ��. If you think that you are being subjected to undue influence, you should refer to the Conflict of Interest Procedure and seek further advice from your supervisor or the��Legal Services Branch.

If you are the supervisor of someone who declares undue influence involving a foreign national, please note and consider some additional reporting obligations you may both have under the Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme. Significant penalties can apply to those who fail to register a relevant relationship.

�Ӱ�ֱ��n Consumer Law (ACL) applies to all of the products and services the �Ӱ�ֱ�� of Adelaide offers, sells or promotes. ACL provides protection to consumers by setting rules that all organisations must observe when doing business. These rules are also relevant to any form of engagement the �Ӱ�ֱ�� has with students, as consumers of education services, and may extend to other individuals, contractors and businesses too.

ACL is intended to ensure that consumers:

• Get what they reasonably expect and have paid for
• Are not taken advantage of
• Receive fair terms in any agreed arrangement
• Are protected when the product or service does not meet the standard or quality promised.

For full details about ACL in a university context, refer to the Consumer and Competition Law Compliance Manual.

As ACL applies to �Ӱ�ֱ�� operations broadly, the key obligation for �Ӱ�ֱ�� personnel is to be vigilant and precise in:

• The preparation and presentation of information (e.g. advertising, correspondence, emails, conversations, social media, negotiations and agreement preparation); and
• The expectations you convey when you engage with prospective students or partners.

Be aware that under ACL, you can't rely on disclaimers to overcome any misleading impressions created, that silence or failure to clarify an arrangement can be considered misleading or deceptive, just as statements can be, and that even if exaggerations or misprints are innocent mistakes, this fact alone will not diminish the rights of a consumer.

This also means that you should avoid statements of personal opinion which might be offered as friendly encouragement to a prospective student or business partner but may lead them to form an incorrect view about the outcome of an arrangement they are entering into with the �Ӱ�ֱ��.

ACL sets an important threshold for a broad range of business transactions in �Ӱ�ֱ�� and offers a measure of the integrity of the �Ӱ�ֱ��’s delivery of goods and services. The consequences of an ACL breach can be significant for the �Ӱ�ֱ��, including investigations by regulators and hefty penalties (up to $10M). Potential flow-on effects include the imposition by regulators or courts of special conditions or restrictions; damages payouts to affected parties; operational disruption leading to financial losses and reputational damage.

If you are involved in a breach of ACL, or failed to clarify representations made, you may be personally exposed to a penalty up to $500k. You might also be subject to disciplinary action under the �Ӱ�ֱ��’s Enterprise Agreement; or investigation by other external agencies such as the .

ACL is reflected in other regulatory regimes that apply to the �Ӱ�ֱ��. The Education Services for Overseas Students requires, as a condition of accreditation, that providers ensure that all marketing and promotional material (including where such material is provided through education agents) complies with ACL.

The �Ӱ�ֱ�� must comply with statutory obligations to notify the����of any written arrangements made with��foreign entities.

The Foreign Arrangements Scheme (FAS) is established by the�� and applies to all �Ӱ�ֱ��n State and Territory entities, including all public universities. The Scheme applies to proposed arrangements that meet the criteria set by the Act.

For the purpose of the scheme, a 'foreign entity' includes foreign governments at national and local levels and their departments and agencies, including some universities.

This means that whenever the �Ӱ�ֱ�� enters into an arrangement with a foreign entity, including a foreign university or research institute, it must determine whether the obligation to notify applies.

The following resources are intended to support �Ӱ�ֱ�� personnel to��understand this��legal requirement and to determine whether a compliance obligations is likely to apply.

• Foreign Arrangement Scheme FAQs��(including how to access the �Ӱ�ֱ��'s review and endorsement process)
• Foreign Arrangements Scheme legislative summary diagram��- provides an overview of the operation of the Scheme
• Foreign Arrangements Scheme due diligence explainer��- including a description of the legislative criteria for Foreign Entities

Any arrangement that is made with a relevant foreign entity must be managed according to the Act:

• A��14-day��notification deadline applies once the �Ӱ�ֱ�� has entered into��a foreign arrangement.
• All notifications are��lodged by the �Ӱ�ֱ�� via the FAS online portal - the name of the arrangement and the parties involved may be published on the .

Global Engagement��and ICS through Research Services (as applicable) are authorised to lodge and maintain a record of all required notifications on behalf of the �Ӱ�ֱ��. For��further advice and assistance with FAS compliance, including notification of an arrangement, please visit the��Foreign Compliance website.

�Ӱ�ֱ��n citizens and permanent residents who arrange with a foreign principal to act on their behalf for the purpose of influencing political or government outcomes must register under the Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme (FITS). This may apply to the actions of an individual or a group of individuals, such as research institutes.

A FITS compliance obligation arises when an activity or arrangement involves a process that will, directly or implicitly, exert some form of influence over a government decision making process (broadly defined). Potentially, a registrable activity or arrangement could include routine activities such as making applications or submissions to government decision-makers which have mutual benefit for you and the foreign entity.

Anyone who formally or informally agrees to act for a foreign principal must consider whether they have a statutory obligation to register that relationship under with the Commonwealth Attorney-General’s Department, and complete a formal assessment of the activity. Details of the registered relationship and activity are published on the

The purpose of the scheme is to provide the public with visibility of the nature, level and extent of foreign influence on �Ӱ�ֱ��'s government and politics.

Penalties of up to 5 years’ imprisonment may apply to individuals who ignore their obligations and fail to meet the registration requirements set by the Scheme.

Individuals who disregard the obligations of others when the nature of the activities are known to them, may also face penalties.

Some personnel, such as school or faculty managers, academic supervisors of research projects or HDR students, or business partnership specialists should be alert to FITS compliance obligations because there can be major consequences for individuals, the �Ӱ�ֱ�� and �Ӱ�ֱ��n democracy when the obligation to register arrangements is not met.

The following resources are available to assist �Ӱ�ֱ�� personnel to understand these legal obligations and make an assessment of the registration requirement.

• Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme FAQs and detailed guidelines
• Foreign Influence Checklist
• (issued by the Attorney-General’s Department)

The scheme is established by the ��(Cth). Rules made under the Act give detail about the operation of the Scheme:

Foreign interference occurs when activities are carried out by, or on behalf of a foreign actor, which are coercive, clandestine, deceptive or corrupting and are contrary to �Ӱ�ֱ��’s sovereignty, values and national interests.

Activities which threaten �Ӱ�ֱ��’s national interest can be unexpected: like unauthorised foreign access to �Ӱ�ֱ�� IT systems (cyber-hacking) or to original research findings (theft of intellectual property). Interference may also manifest as inappropriately seeking to influence course content, research directions or student and staff actions.

The – a collaboration of representatives from the university sector and �Ӱ�ֱ��n government agencies – considers that the potential for such threats should be actively anticipated and preventative measures put in place.

�Ӱ�ֱ��n universities are expected to ensure that the broad benefits to �Ӱ�ֱ�� derived from international collaborations and recruitment are balanced against the potential for foreign interference to be facilitated through these relationships.��

were mutually adopted in November 2019 and revised in November 2021. The premise of the Guidelines is that everyone involved with universities has a role to play in protecting �Ӱ�ֱ��’s national interest and those with international connections should apply particular vigilance, including:

• Governance and risk frameworks
  • understand university policies and procedures designed to help mitigate foreign interference risks
  • be familiar with the risk management framework and how it can be used to manage foreign engagement and report threats
• Due diligence
  • check out your international partner before you commit
  • assess any potential risks to your academic autonomy or intellectual property
  • declare foreign engagement activities to the university
  • ensure that collaborative agreements are reviewed and give robust protection to your, the �Ӱ�ֱ��’s and �Ӱ�ֱ��’s interests
• Education and awareness strategies
  • cultivate a security culture with your colleagues��and share knowledge of foreign risks
  • seek advice and training that is appropriate for your level of exposure to foreign nationals or entities
  • refer to available guides and resources as a part of your decision-making
• Cyber security��
  • be aware and apply the protective strategies recommended
  • seek advice from others, including��IT support, and share concerns about vulnerabilities��

Deliberate acts of foreign interference (espionage, theft of trade secrets or sabotage) are offences under the��Criminal Code Act 1995, with penalties ranging from 10 years to life imprisonment. Failure to prevent foreign interference��is also an offence. Anyone aware of a substantial risk to national security but who nonetheless fails to act to control that risk, could face up to 20 years’ imprisonment.

Being aware of foreign interference risks, properly managing those risks, and applying appropriate security to sensitive information and knowledge, protects you, the �Ӱ�ֱ�� and �Ӱ�ֱ�� against the substantial consequences that could follow.

Contact the��Legal Services Branch��for advice and assistance with this process.

Facilitation payments are unofficial payments offered to public officials to secure an administrative outcome or speed up a routine government activity. Regardless of jurisdiction, they are not “normal business practice”. Facilitation payments distort government procedures and undermine��transparency in business practices for the advantage of a few corrupt individuals.

The reality is that such payments are bribes and are illegal in most OECD countries including �Ӱ�ֱ��. Regardless of where this activity occurs, an �Ӱ�ֱ��n may be prosecuted under section 70.2 of the����(Cth) if they provide or offer to someone (directly or indirectly) a benefit that is not legitimately due to that person, with the intention of influencing a foreign public official in the exercise of their duties, in order to obtain or retain a business advantage.

It is also an offence to conceal bribery by intentionally or recklessly falsify accounting documents. Significant fines or imprisonment up to 10 years may apply under Division 490 of the��Criminal Code. Irregularities in financial accounts should not be ignored.

If you give a bribe to a public official or if you ignore irregularities in financial accounting records intended to conceal a bribe, you risk investigation by the �Ӱ�ֱ��n Federal Police and criminal charges that can lead to imprisonment. Report any requests for facilitation payments or evidence of falsified accounts to your Head of School or Branch.

Some goods and technologies are controlled and cannot be exported or transferred overseas without a��permit issued by the �Ӱ�ֱ��n Government. This includes the trade in traditional military goods, such as weaponry, but also componentry or technologies that have a dual use, such as sensing or measurement technologies. Researchers should check to see if any of technologies they are working on are included on the��Defence and Strategic Goods List.

International multilateral agreements have been established to ensure the safe international trade in goods and technologies that have actual or potential strategic or military use. Because of the global risk, the concept of export is broadly defined and can include the transmission overseas of��controlled information��such as design plans or software. �Ӱ�ֱ��’s international obligations under these agreements are given force in �Ӱ�ֱ�� by the����(Cth) and the����(Cth).

The export from �Ӱ�ֱ�� of listed goods and technologies is strictly controlled and a permit must be obtained. Penalties of up to 10 years in prison and/or up to $525k apply to individuals who ignore their obligations. It is better apply for a permit and be told by the Defence Export Controls Office that you don’t need one.

The �Ӱ�ֱ�� has process to supports academic researchers to meet their obligations under the Act, but it is ultimately the responsibility and liability of each academic to understand the potential strategic defence risks that may attach to their research and to seek assistance in managing this risk.

Contact the Manager, Defence and National Security��for advice and assistance with this process.

Sanctions laws can impact on a broad range of university activities, including student enrolments, higher degree research projects, academic or commercial collaborations and staff recruitment. International sanctions��are applied by governments as an economic or diplomatic objection to the actions of other nation states, entities or people.

Sanctions impose restrictions on certain activities such as trade in goods and services (including research, education, training or intellectual property), financial transactions or travel. The scope of the restriction will vary depending on the severity of the behaviour and the necessity for censure.

The����(DFAT) provides a searchable database called the����which contains details all persons and entities who are subject to targeted financial sanctions or travel bans under sanctions laws. DFAT also publishes details of the current��(listing countries, entities and the sanctions that have been applied).

Sanctions can affect a broad range of �Ӱ�ֱ�� activities and a high level of vigilance should be applied where there is risk or uncertainty. An individual who breaches a sanction can face up to 10 years in prison and/or a fine set at the greater of $500k or three times the value of the transaction involved. The �Ӱ�ֱ�� could also be subject to a fine of $2M+ even where the failure to consider the impact of a sanction on their activity was solely that of an individual member of staff.

Contact the relevant administrative area, the��Legal Services Branch, or the��Manager, Defence and National Security for more information if you are concerned that a sanction may apply to a person, activity or project.